Tag Archives: Cost Accounting Standards

Potential for No More DCAA Incurred Cost Audits!

DCAA Incurred Cost Audits

Defense government contractors could potentially see no more DCAA incurred cost audits beginning October 1, 2018. Section 820 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2017 has established a new and independent Defense Cost Accounting Standards Board (DCASB) to oversee cost accounting standards across all of Department of Defense (DoD). The three primary objectives for this new board are:

  1. Review cost accounting standards created by the CAS Board and provide recommendations
  2. Implement cost accounting standards across the DoD
  3. Develop standards to ensure DoD’s adherence to standards established by the CAS Board or GAAP

The board’s first order of business will be to amend the existing CAS Board’s implementing statute 41 U.S.C. § 1501 to specify additional duties for the CAS Board. For instance, one new standard will request the CAS Board meets at least once per quarter. A notice of each meeting and the meeting’s agenda will be published in the Federal Register. Additionally, they will report annually to multiple congressional committees regarding how it has conformed its accounting standards to GAAP and minimized the burden on contractors.

A noteworthy change more pertinent to government contractors is the potential to avoid further DCAA incurred cost audits. This could be achieved by the DCAA accepting a reputable CPA firm’s indirect rate audit reports with no additional testing required. The only condition is that the audit must be performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

This is a significant change as DoD contractors will be able to finalize their indirect rates and close out their contracts at a much faster and efficient pace. Currently, incurred cost audits may last about one to two years, although they usually do not begin until years after the filing of the incurred cost submission.

Those in a prime or subcontractor relationship will now have the benefit of settling and closing out on-going subcontracts in a timely manner. Subcontractor costs often linger because of the wait for a subcontractor’s rates to be audited and settled. If a subcontractor does not have any prime DoD contracts the wait can be lengthy.

The Federal Government will now have the advantage of faster closeouts with contractors and the ability to de-obligate any remaining funding at a much more rapid pace. Furthermore, they also will be able to close-out contracts more quickly than in the past.

One downside and confusion regarding NDAA Section 820 will occur for contractors who have both civilian and defense contracts. Who will have the final say? Will the new DCASB create new standards?  What effects will this newly formed board have on the existing and long standing CASB? We’re not sure how this will all be resolved; however, Aronson will continue to provide updates as October 1, 2018 approaches. Stay tuned!

For any questions, please contact Donna Dominguez at 301.222.8232 or ddominguez@aronsonllc.com.

Decoding Budgeting Indirect Rates Webinar: Questions? Aronson Answers – Part II

As promised, a continuation of the Q&A from Aronson’s Government Contracting webinar “Decoding Budgeted Indirect Rates,” presented by Donna Dominguez and Aisha Mian.

Read more ...

Decoding Budgeting Indirect Rates Webinar: Questions? Aronson Answers

On October 20, 2016, our Aronson LLC government contracting specialists Donna Dominguez and Aisha Mian hosted “Decoding Budgeted Indirect Rates,” where they provided tips, guidance, and best practices to help government contractors efficiently build their budgeted indirect rates for the upcoming year. As a follow up to this webinar, Donna and Aisha have prepared answers to a large number of attendee questions that we wanted to share. To watch the webinar, please visit this link.

Read more ...

Is Your Purchasing System Compliant for the Alliant 2 RFP?

In late June 2016, the highly coveted Alliant 2 SB RFP was released and within the 174 page document, there lies section L.5.4.2 Approved Purchasing System.  This scoring element is 1500 points of the total points and requires offerors to provide support that their purchasing system has been approved for compliance within the past five years though a Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR).     

Read more ...

Is Your Accounting System Adequate for the Alliant 2 RFP?

In late June 2016, the highly coveted Alliant 2 SB RFP was released and within the 174 page document, there lies section L.5.4.1 Cost Accounting System and Audit Information.  This scoring element is weighted at 6.6 percent of the total points and requires offerors to provide support that their accounting system has been deemed adequate through an SF1408 audit.

Read more ...

View Archives


Latest Webinar Videos