Are you deliberating whether your construction company needs a valuation in the short- or long-term? Then you need an expert active in the industry.
Often a construction business owner may believe there is no immediate need for a valuation of their construction company. Other times there may be a specific and fairly urgent need. Whether you have an immediate need or not, it seems that any business owner should understand how much the company is worth. Shouldn’t you?
You may need your valuation for a number of reasons including an unsolicited offer to buy the business, a complete or partial internal management buyout, divorce of a business owner, retirement planning, and estate planning. Regardless of the reason you should absolutely engage a valuation specialist that has the right skills. What should you consider?
Value drivers vary by industry, and the skills and industry expertise required to appropriately value a construction company are not the same as the skills required for valuing other businesses such as biotech firms, professional service firms, restaurants, and other industries. While a valuation firm may have the expertise to prepare a valuation based on the traditional valuation approaches (as displayed in Figure 1 below), a sound understanding and strong working knowledge of the particular industry of the entity being valued can make all the difference.
Choosing a valuation specialist without the right industry expertise can result in an unreasonably high or low valuation for your business. For example, an inaccurate valuation may result when a valuation specialist relies too heavily (or exclusively) on a particular valuation approach.
In the context of the Market Approach, we know there are public companies that participate in the Construction and Engineering (C&E) Industry. Those companies are typically involved in many types of C&E services, whereas privately held middle market C&E firms are often narrowly focused on one particular sub-industry or deliverable. As a result, complete reliance on public company valuation multiples as a proxy for value may not be the best choice. If public company valuation metrics are used, an experienced valuation specialist will consider and adjust for how the construction contractor being valued stacks up against the public company references.
Most middle market construction contractors do not have revenue sources that are regularly recurring. This is one reason that valuation specialists need to be thoughtful in applying the Income Approach. Relying on a construction contractor’s historical revenues and profits as a basis for the valuation can be problematic for a variety of reasons. Likewise, the valuation specialist cannot blindly rely on prospective financial information provided by management. For construction contractors, reasonable application of the Income Approach may require consideration of factors such as:
Understanding the entity to be valued and the valuation trends and considerations for that particular industry is extremely important in terms of valuation accuracy. The bottom line is this: you want to use a valuation expert that knows your industry and is actively involved in your industry. The result will be a valuation that is within a reasonable range of values and that can be used as a tool for making the difficult decisions that lie ahead for your construction company.
Regardless of why your construction company needs to be valued, Aronson’s experienced valuation professionals deliver solid conclusions supported by rigorous analysis and informed judgment. Our construction industry valuation reports are designed to withstand intense scrutiny – whether from the IRS in a tax compliance setting, auditors in a financial reporting setting, or cross-examination in the courtroom. The members of our Financial Advisory Services practice regularly perform complex valuation engagements of privately-held business entities for situations such as: shareholder disputes, estate planning and gifts, succession planning, purchase price allocations, and marital disputes. One or more of these matters will likely affect your construction business. Is it time to take a look?
Make sure you check out Part 2 of this series: “What Construction Companies Need to Know about Valuation: Part 2 – What Drives Value?“.
Aronson LLC’s Financial Advisory Services practice assists construction contractors with a variety of valuation and M&A-related services, including pre-acquisition due diligence and post-acquisition purchase price allocation analysis. To learn more about our platform of services, refer to our website or contact Bill Foote at 301.231.6299 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
In a recent blog post, Deb Carpenter Beck, Sage’s Senior Director of Content Marketing, reflected on an article she read about industries with the highest levels of employee happiness. Fast Company Magazine, which featured the piece, put those in the construction industry high on their list. One of the reasons mentioned was the ability for an individual to see a final, tangible product, which is a direct result of their hard work. Click here to read the article and Deb’s commentary.
The September score for the American Institute of Architects (AIA) Architecture Billings Index (ABI) was positive for the fifth month in row according to the AIA’s press release on October 23, 2013 with a score of 54.3. The new projects inquiry index was down from the previous month with a score of 58.6.
As mentioned in our blog last month on this topic we were slightly skeptical about the continued positive scores relative to the type and profitability of the construction work available to bid on. This month it appears that there is skepticism
The August score for the American Institute of Architects (AIA) Architecture Billings Index (ABI) was 53.8, which was released on September 18, 2013 by the AIA. This was the fourth consecutive score above 50 and the highest score since February of 2013. The new projects inquiry index was 63.0, which decreased from the previous month. The AIA’s press release is available here.
Given the last four months, the prospects for the construction industry look positive, and it currently appears that a full recovery is underway, as indicated by the AIA’s Chief Economist, Kermit Baker. As mentioned last month, the positive economic news inherent in the ABI does not mean it is translating to your construction company. Also, this index does not measure the profitability of the work that may be in process or available to bid on. In other words, there may be more projects to bid on, but not at the margins the industry grew accustom to before the recession. Another item of particular concern is the prospect that there may be increases in interest rates. This could have an adverse affect on the construction industry’s recovery. That being said, take this positive news in stride and continue employing the business practices developed during the recession until a more sustained and comprehensive recovery is felt by the industry.
The American Institute of Architects (AIA) released its July Architecture Billings Index (ABI) on August 21, 2013, which reflected the third straight month a positive score was recorded, and the eleventh time in the last twelve months a positive score was posted. The July score was 52.7 and the new projects inquiry index also increased from the previous month to 66.7. The AIA’s press release is available here.
As an owner or an employee of a construction company you are well aware of how difficult the market place can be. Just because the ABI appears to reflect the possibility of future growth does not necessarily mean that there will be significant sustained growth for the construction industry, or if your company will even be fortunate enough to bid on and be awarded new projects. The ABI does, however, provide the information needed to plan for what could be a busier and more robust future. The ABI has posted positive scores for almost an entire year which makes the outlook for an increase in construction spending more probable, and leaves the construction industry in a better spot than it was a year ago.